ArticleJournal of evidence-based social work (2019)
Youth Comorbidity Patterns and Research Domain Criteria (RDoC)-Informed Factors: A Scoping Review of Person-Centered Psychopathology Research.
Article in Journal of evidence-based social work (2019). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeHigh rates of comorbid psychopathology have driven a growing body of person-centered research to understand the grouping structure of youth comorbidity by identifying meaningful comorbidity patterns and validating them with neurobehavioral factors. The National Institute of Mental Health's Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) offers an etiological framework for systematically identifying constructs organized around major functioning domains. This scoping review study mapped person-centered comorbidity studies and synthesized the RDoC-informed factors of comorbidity patterns. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe followed Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework. Five databases (e.g. PubMed and CINAHL) were searched. Twenty-five peer-reviewed studies examining comorbidity patterns in youth up to age 17 were included.
resultsOne normative pattern was consistently identified, along with one general psychopathology pattern with a higher probability of all symptoms. Additionally, specific patterns, such as internalizing and externalizing patterns, reflecting unique covariances among assessed symptoms, were identified. Of the 43 extracted RDoC-informed factors, systems for social processes (33%) emerged as the most widely examined domains, followed by cognitive (26%), negative valence (19%), and arousal and regulatory (14%) systems. Most factors were differentially associated with comorbidity patterns. DISCUSSION: The identified comorbidity patterns supported a conceptualization of psychopathology with broader factors, such as one general and other specific psychopathology factors, reflecting underlying liability for a range of symptoms. Definitive conclusions about the effects of RDoC-informed factors require further studies, given limited evidence of positive valence (5%) and sensorimotor (5%) systems.
conclusionMore rigorous incorporation of novel RDoC-informed factors into comorbidity studies may inform evidence-based preventive strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.