Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40882029›Full record

ArticleCancer research2025

Modeling Early-Onset Cancer Kinetics Reveals Changes in Underlying Risk and the Impact of Population Screening.

Navid Mohammad Mirzaei, Chin Hur, Mary Beth Terry, Piero Dalerba, Wan Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Navid Mohammad MirzaeiDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-0971-0514
Chin HurDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-2819-7576
Mary Beth TerryDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-4106-5033
Piero DalerbaCenter for Discovery and Innovation (CDI), Hackensack Meridian Health (HMH), Nutley, New Jersey.ORCID 0000-0002-8815-4981
Wan YangDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-7555-9728

Funding

UNCOVER: underlying novel causes of onset of very early cancer researchR01CA257971 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI YANG, WAN · 2021 to 2025
$2.0M
National Cancer Institute (NCI) R01CA257971NCI NIH HHS R01 CA257971
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies have reported increases in early-onset cancer cases (diagnosed less than 50 years of age) and raised questions about whether the increase is related to earlier diagnosis from nonspecific medical tests as reflected by decreasing tumor-size-at-diagnosis (apparent effects) or actual increases in underlying cancer risk (true effects), or both. The classic Multistage Clonal Expansion (MSCE) model assumes cancer detection at the first malignant cell's emergence, although later modifications have included lag-times or stochasticity in detection to represent the delay in tumor detection. In this study, we introduced an approach to explicitly incorporate tumor-size-at-diagnosis in the MSCE framework accounting for improvements in cancer detection over time to distinguish between apparent and true increases in early-onset cancer incidence. The model was structurally identifiable and provided better parameter estimation than the classic model. The model was applied to colorectal, breast, and thyroid cancers to examine changes in cancer risk while accounting for detection improvements over time in three representative birth cohorts (1950-1954, 1965-1969, and 1980-1984). The analyses suggested accelerated carcinogenic events and shorter mean sojourn times (the average time from the first malignant cell emergence to cancer detection) in more recent cohorts. Furthermore, using this model to examine the screening impact on the incidence of breast and colorectal cancers, for which both have established screening protocols, provided results that align with well-documented differences in screening effects between these cancers. These findings underscore the importance of incorporating tumor-size-at-diagnosis in cancer modeling and support true increases in early-onset cancer risk in recent years for breast, colorectal, and thyroid cancers. SIGNIFICANCE: A model of early-onset cancer trends that distinguishes true risk from detection effects accurately captures cancer kinetics, trends in cancer progression, and the impact of screening, which could inform cancer prevention strategies. This article is part of a special series: Driving Cancer Discoveries with Computational Research, Data Science, and Machine Learning/AI .

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerNeoplasmsAge of OnsetBreast NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansIncidenceKineticsMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedRisk FactorsThyroid Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID40882029
PMCPMC12445609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.