Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40881984›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2025

CardioFit: a WebGL-based tool for fast and efficient parametrization of cardiac action potential models to fit user-provided data.

Darby I Cairns, Maxfield Roth Comstock, Flavio H Fenton, Elizabeth M Cherry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Darby I Cairns *School of Computational Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Maxfield Roth Comstock *School of Computational Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Flavio H FentonDepartment of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Elizabeth M CherrySchool of Computational Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5194-9572

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac action potential models allow examination of a variety of cardiac dynamics, including how behaviour may change under specific interventions. To study a specific scenario, including patient-specific cases, model parameter sets must be found that accurately reproduce the dynamics of interest. To facilitate this complex and time-consuming process, we present CardioFit, an interactive browser-based tool that uses the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm implemented in JavaScript and takes advantage of the WebGL API for hardware acceleration. Our tool allows rapid customization and can find low-error fittings to user-provided voltage time series or action potential duration data from multiple cycle lengths in a few iterations (10-32), corresponding to a runtime of a few seconds on most machines. Additionally, our tool focuses on ease of use and flexibility, providing a webpage interface that allows users to select a subset of parameters to fit, set the range of values each parameter is allowed to assume, and control the PSO algorithm hyperparameters. We demonstrate our tool's utility by fitting a variety of models to different datasets, showing how convergence is affected by model choice, dataset properties and PSO algorithmic settings, and explaining new insights gained about the physiological and dynamical roles of the model parameters.

Indexed as

cardiac modellingidentifiabilityparameter fittingparticle swarm optimization

Identifiers

PMID40881984
PMCPMC12381663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.