ArticleRoyal Society open science2025
Companion pigs alternate orientation between humans and snout-inaccessible targets.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Companion pigs alternate orientation between humans and snout-inaccessible targets.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous research on intensely human-socialized pigs found no evidence for orientation alternations to direct human attention to an inaccessible target, the benchmark behaviour that in many other species has been reported to evidence capacity for functionally referential communication with humans. However, the unsolvable task paradigms that are typically used may mask communicative capacities by promoting manipulative behaviours in animals with strong independent problem-solving tendencies, like pigs. Here, using a novel out-of-reach paradigm that does not induce manipulative biases, we reassessed the capability of pigs for functionally referential communication with humans. We compared the emergence of orientation alternations between a human and an elevated, physically inaccessible target in adult companion pigs and dogs, a species characterized by more human-dependent problem-solving. We found that with these settings, pigs attempted to solve the task independently even less often than dogs and, similarly to dogs, pigs also exhibited orientation alternations. This is the first report demonstrating human-oriented functionally referential communicative behaviours in pigs, suggesting that this capacity may be more widespread across mammals than previously thought.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.