Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40881983›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2025

Companion pigs alternate orientation between humans and snout-inaccessible targets.

Paula Pérez Fraga, Fanni Lehoczki, Attila Andics

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Paula Pérez FragaNeuroethology of Communication Lab, Department of Ethology, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5625-3224
Fanni LehoczkiNeuroethology of Communication Lab, Department of Ethology, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4024-4213
Attila AndicsNeuroethology of Communication Lab, Department of Ethology, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research on intensely human-socialized pigs found no evidence for orientation alternations to direct human attention to an inaccessible target, the benchmark behaviour that in many other species has been reported to evidence capacity for functionally referential communication with humans. However, the unsolvable task paradigms that are typically used may mask communicative capacities by promoting manipulative behaviours in animals with strong independent problem-solving tendencies, like pigs. Here, using a novel out-of-reach paradigm that does not induce manipulative biases, we reassessed the capability of pigs for functionally referential communication with humans. We compared the emergence of orientation alternations between a human and an elevated, physically inaccessible target in adult companion pigs and dogs, a species characterized by more human-dependent problem-solving. We found that with these settings, pigs attempted to solve the task independently even less often than dogs and, similarly to dogs, pigs also exhibited orientation alternations. This is the first report demonstrating human-oriented functionally referential communicative behaviours in pigs, suggesting that this capacity may be more widespread across mammals than previously thought.

Indexed as

doginterspecific communicationpigreferential communication

Identifiers

PMID40881983
PMCPMC12381496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.