ArticlePsychology of sexual orientation and gender diversity2025
Similarities and distinctions in the drug use and sexual behavior of transfeminine and nonbinary adults assigned male at birth in the United States.
Article in Psychology of sexual orientation and gender diversity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Research has clearly documented high rates of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection among transfeminine (TF) people (including trans women). This research has largely overlooked nonbinary people assigned male at birth (NBAMAB) despite their gender fluidity. This study examined similarities and distinctions in the occurrence and frequency of condomless anal sex (CAS) with casual male partners and associated drug use among TF and NBAMAB people. Between November 2017 and March 2020, a total of 2,758 TF and 2,347 NBAMAB adult (aged ≥18 years) participants living in the US completed an online survey assessing sociodemographics, drug use, sexual behavior, relationship status and relationship characteristics among those who were partnered. Multigroup hurdle models indicated that the occurrence and frequency of CAS with casual male partners did not differ significantly between TF and NBAMAB people who were not in a relationship. Partner gender and sexual agreement predicted CAS with a casual partner among TF but not NBAMAB respondents. Those TF participants with male partners and nonmonogamous sexual agreements had the highest odds of engaging in CAS and the highest frequency of CAS when they did. In both groups, illicit drug use was associated with higher occurrence and frequency of CAS with casual male partners. Cannabis use was not associated with either. The findings align with prior studies highlighting TF individuals' risk for HIV infection, particularly those who are single and partnered TF with male partners and nonmonogamous agreements. Despite being largely overlooked in HIV research, some people who identify as NBAMAB may engage in similar behaviors as TF individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.