ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Reporting of immune-related adverse events in US Food and Drug Administration approvals of immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Pneumonitis in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Clinical Features, Mechanisms, and Lessons from Lung Cancer.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Immunotherapy for Melanoma in Patients with Altered Immune Systems: Unique Challenges and Clinical Considerations.Advances in therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Predicting the occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) related to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is complex. Monitoring of irAEs is critical as toxicities cause morbidity and impact quality of life. Thus, we systematically evaluated the patterns and consistency of irAEs reporting in trials leading to US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ICI approvals. Methods: We evaluated 75 primary articles from 2011-2021. The authors independently collected data regarding reporting frequency as a binary classification of reported versus not reported and irAE frequency of 24 irAEs classified by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Version 1.2024 guidelines. Reporting trends and irAE events were analyzed by study year, phase, primary tumor type, and monotherapy versus combination therapy. Results: Across the irAEs evaluated, 41.7% were reported in less than 33% of the trials, 16.6% were reported in 34-66% of trials, and 41.7% were reported in 67-100% of trials. The most frequently reported irAEs included diarrhea/colitis (100%), fatigue (99%), and maculopapular rash (93%). Some infrequently reported irAEs included myocarditis (21%), uveitis (17%), and aseptic meningitis (4%). Additionally, certain organ systems were more frequently reported, including gastroenterology (100%) and endocrine (97%), while others, including cardiology (21%) and ophthalmology (17%), were less frequently reported. The reporting of rarer irAEs significantly increased over time. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated significant inconsistencies in irAE reporting in the primary literature of trials associated with FDA approvals, particularly for rarer irAEs. Efforts to standardize irAE reporting from clinical trials in the primary literature are needed for more consistent dissemination of information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.