Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40881857›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2025

Analysis of the safety and efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on four randomized controlled trials.

Tao Luo, Hao Yang, Xingqiang Ran, Binwen Xu, Yue Zhang, Liwen Zhang, Chengcheng Zhang, Maoyong Fu

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tao LuoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, North Sichuan Medical College Affiliated Hospital, Nanchong, Sichuan, China.
Hao YangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, North Sichuan Medical College Affiliated Hospital, Nanchong, Sichuan, China.
Xingqiang RanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, North Sichuan Medical College Affiliated Hospital, Nanchong, Sichuan, China.
Binwen XuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, North Sichuan Medical College Affiliated Hospital, Nanchong, Sichuan, China.
Yue ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, North Sichuan Medical College Affiliated Hospital, Nanchong, Sichuan, China.
Liwen ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, North Sichuan Medical College Affiliated Hospital, Nanchong, Sichuan, China.
Chengcheng ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, North Sichuan Medical College Affiliated Hospital, Nanchong, Sichuan, China.
Maoyong FuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, North Sichuan Medical College Affiliated Hospital, Nanchong, Sichuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Esophageal cancer is a leading type of cancer globally. Most patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer present at a locally advanced stage, for which the standard treatment paradigm involves a multimodal approach combining neoadjuvant therapy with surgical resection. However, even under this regimen, 30%-40% of patients develop distant metastases postoperatively. This underscores an urgent need to refine existing therapeutic strategies and develop innovative multimodal protocols to address persistent oncological challenges in this high-risk population. In recent years, the advent of immunotherapy has expanded its application from advanced to early-stage settings, with neoadjuvant immunotherapy gaining traction in the management of locally advanced esophageal cancer. However, critical uncertainties persist regarding its preoperative use. This study aims to conduct a meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (nICT) versus conventional neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) in this patient population. Methods: A comprehensive literature retrieval strategy was implemented across PubMed (NLM), Embase (Elsevier), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, targeting studies published prior to December 2024 that compared novel immunochemotherapy (nICT) with conventional nCT in locoregionally advanced esophageal carcinoma. Pooled statistical analysis of the eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was subsequently conducted to evaluate comparative safety and efficacy profiles. Results: The final analysis incorporated four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comprising a total cohort of 629 participants. Patients receiving nICT for locoregionally advanced esophageal carcinoma demonstrated significantly prolonged intervals between final preoperative treatment and definitive surgical resection when compared to those undergoing conventional nCT alone [weighted mean difference (WMD): 0.71 weeks; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.39-1.02; Conclusion: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy for treating locally advanced esophageal cancer is effective and safe. However, due to the absence of long-term follow-up data, additional large-scale, multicenter randomized controlled trials are required to confirm these results.

Indexed as

esophageal cancermeta-analysisneoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapyneoadjuvant chemotherapyrandomized controlled trials

Identifiers

PMID40881857
PMCPMC12381777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.