ArticleInternational journal of engineering and technology : IJET2024
A System for the Qualitative Testing of Microfluidic Artificial Lungs Using Water.
Article in International journal of engineering and technology : IJET, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microfluidic Artificial Lungs (μALs) are a promising technology for next generation artificial lungs, potentially offering improved treatment options for patients awaiting lung transplantation or requiring temporary respiratory support. Microfluidic artificial lungs are created using state-of-the-art manufacturing methods and can replicate the intricate flow networks of natural lungs and provide more efficient gas exchange. However, testing with blood is often labor intensive, logistically challenging, and expensive, which slows down the development of these technologies. We present a self-contained artificial lung testing system, addressing the challenges associated with traditional blood testing methods. To evaluate the artificial lungs' gas exchange capabilities, water is employed as a safe, cheap, and convenient alternative to blood. pH measurements serve as a practical measure of carbon dioxide exchange, opposed to blood-based carbon dioxide measurements. Sensors are integrated into a single data logging system to reduce human error. The system successfully achieved qualitative gas exchange capabilities by adding and removing carbon dioxide from distilled water using 4 devices. Integrated pressure sensors measured pressure drop to determine fluidic resistance, providing insights into safe operational parameters. Finally, the system was demonstrated to be easily modified to evaluate oxygen exchange in blood, providing an easy transition to the next step of testing. The automated artificial lung testing system presents an alternative to conventional blood-based testing methods, offering cost-effective, safe, and efficient qualitative evaluation of microfluidic artificial lungs. This innovation streamlines μAL development, allowing for the faster development of this next generation artificial lung technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.