ArticleGMS hygiene and infection control2025
Fungal contaminants in Turkish bottled water and their mycotoxin-producing potential.
Article in GMS hygiene and infection control, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The chemical composition and microbial contaminants of commercially bottled water are managed according to public health regulations, but there are gaps in these criteria for fungal agents. For this reason, commercial bottled water brands filled in 19-L polycarbonate bottles from various water sources in western Anatolia and sold in Izmir and neighboring provinces were randomly selected and analyzed. Materials and methods: Fungal screening was carried out in water samples using the membrane filtration technique. The number of fungi was counted in colony-forming units (cfu)/100 ml. All fungi isolated from packaged water samples were initially phenotypically analyzed for initial preliminary identification. Amplification of the well-conserved internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region was performed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using internal transcribed spacer (ITS)1/ITS4 primers for genotypic identification of the isolates. Using the basic local alignment search tool (BLAST), sequencing results were compared with the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database, and species assignments were made for 31 samples. 25 moulds and 6 yeasts were identified, and molecular identification was supported by the actin gene region. The mycotoxin formation potential of the isolated Penicillium, Aspergillus, Alternaria and Results: The most dominant strains detected in the analysis of water samples were Cladosporium, Penicillium and Alternaria. With 411.586 µg/l, the amount of citrinin was well above the upper limit for beverages. Conclusion: The values obtained here emphasize that fungal contaminants and mycotoxins in bottled water should be included in the water analysis criteria. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first detailed research in this field in Turkey.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.