ReviewFrontiers in neurology2025
Precision intervention of virtual reality training for balance and gait in Parkinson's disease: a dose-response meta-analysis.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Virtual reality training for gait disorders in Parkinson's disease: a bibliometric and visual analysis of hotspots and trends using CiteSpace and VOSviewer.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Article
- Article
- Feasibility and Immediate Effects of Dynamic Exercise Using Mixed Reality for Balance Improvement in Older Adults and Individuals With Neurologic Disorders.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2026Article
- Gamifying motor recovery: virtual reality as a therapeutic ally in pantothenate kinase-associated neurodegeneration.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
- Exploring the Effectiveness of Immersive Virtual Reality Rehabilitation for Parkinson's Disease: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study systematically evaluated the effects of virtual reality training (VRT) on balance ability and functional gait in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients and used dose-response analysis to quantify optimal intervention parameters, providing evidence-based guidance for clinical rehabilitation. Methodology: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251008459). Six databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, were searched for RCTs published before March 15th, 2025. Studies were included if they involved PD patients, used VRT, and reported BBS or 6MWT data. A random-effects model was used for meta-analysis to assess VRT's effects and explore optimal training parameters through dose-response analysis. Results: Thirty-two RCTs involving 547 participants were included. VRT significantly improved balance function (BBS: WMD = 3.63, 95%CI 2.89-4.37, Conclusion: VRT significantly improves balance function in PD patients, with a recommended dose of ≤20 min per session, 4-7 times weekly for 4-7 weeks (>40 total sessions). Though not statistically significant for functional gait, the effect size reached MDIC, particularly in non-Asian regions, where sessions of 21-40 min for 4-7 weeks are suggested. Key findings include regional differences, dose specificity, and technical versatility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.