Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40881780›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2025

Precision intervention of virtual reality training for balance and gait in Parkinson's disease: a dose-response meta-analysis.

Hailong Wu, Cheng Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hailong WuTongren University, Tongren, China.
Cheng ZhangZhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study systematically evaluated the effects of virtual reality training (VRT) on balance ability and functional gait in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients and used dose-response analysis to quantify optimal intervention parameters, providing evidence-based guidance for clinical rehabilitation. Methodology: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251008459). Six databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, were searched for RCTs published before March 15th, 2025. Studies were included if they involved PD patients, used VRT, and reported BBS or 6MWT data. A random-effects model was used for meta-analysis to assess VRT's effects and explore optimal training parameters through dose-response analysis. Results: Thirty-two RCTs involving 547 participants were included. VRT significantly improved balance function (BBS: WMD = 3.63, 95%CI 2.89-4.37, Conclusion: VRT significantly improves balance function in PD patients, with a recommended dose of ≤20 min per session, 4-7 times weekly for 4-7 weeks (>40 total sessions). Though not statistically significant for functional gait, the effect size reached MDIC, particularly in non-Asian regions, where sessions of 21-40 min for 4-7 weeks are suggested. Key findings include regional differences, dose specificity, and technical versatility.

Indexed as

balance abilitydose–responsegaitParkinson’s diseasevirtual reality training

Identifiers

PMID40881780
PMCPMC12381877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.