Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40881670›Full record

ArticleAnnual review of statistics and its application2025

High-Dimensional Gene-Environment Interaction Analysis.

Mengyun Wu, Yingmeng Li, Shuangge Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annual review of statistics and its application, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mengyun WuSchool of Statistics and Management, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai, China.
Yingmeng LiSchool of Statistics and Management, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai, China.
Shuangge MaDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

Funding

Novel methods for identifying genetic interactions in cancer prognosisR01CA204120 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Shuangge Ma · 2016 to 2026
$3.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA204120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beyond the main genetic and environmental effects, gene-environment (G-E) interactions have been demonstrated to significantly contribute to the development and progression of complex diseases. Published analyses of G-E interactions have primarily used a supervised framework to model both low-dimensional environmental factors and high-dimensional genetic factors in relation to disease outcomes. In this article, we aim to provide a selective review of methodological developments in G-E interaction analysis from a statistical perspective. The three main families of techniques are hypothesis testing, variable selection, and dimension reduction, which lead to three general frameworks: testing-based, estimation-based, and prediction-based. Linear- and nonlinear-effects analysis, fixed- and random-effects analysis, marginal and joint analysis, and Bayesian and frequentist analysis are reviewed to facilitate the conduct of interaction analysis in a wide range of situations with various assumptions and objectives. Statistical properties, computations, applications, and future directions are also discussed.

Indexed as

dimension reductiongene–environment interactionhypothesis testingmarginal and joint analysisvariable selection

Identifiers

PMID40881670
PMCPMC12383825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.