ArticleAdvances in hematology2025
Real-World Safety and Efficacy of Venetoclax in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Single-Center Comparative Analysis With Randomized Clinical Trials.
Article in Advances in hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Current Status of Molecularly Targeted Therapeutics in Blood Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treating chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax has shown favorable results in randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Regulatory authorities have recognized the need for also investigating the efficacy and safety of new antineoplastic therapies in real-world (RW) studies with patients often characterized by higher age and comorbidities than patients treated in RCTs. We present a RW single-center study of 112 patients with CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) treated with venetoclax at Zealand University Hospital. A total of 74 patients were treated according to the standard clinical practice and 38 were included in RCTs. No significant differences in efficacy profiles, or safety measures were observed between the two cohorts. Both groups presented overall acceptable tolerability and safety profiles to venetoclax. Moreover, our results suggest that tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) was not a clinical challenge in RW patients even when 6- and 12 h blood samples for TLS were omitted. RW CLL/SLL patients treated outside a clinical trial also had comparable safety and efficacy profiles as reported in the MURANO, CLL13, and CLL14 trials. In conclusion, patients with CLL treated with venetoclax in a RW clinical setting exhibit similar efficacy and safety outcomes to those observed in RCTs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.