ReviewClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
Efficacy of Oxymetazoline 0.1% in Acquired Blepharoptosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.
Review in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Abnormal eyelid drooping is a defining feature of blepharoptosis, a disorder that can affect the superior vision field. The standard of care is surgical intervention but may be associated with complications. There is emerging evidence that the direct-acting α-adrenergic agonist ophthalmic solution, oxymetazoline, is effective for blepharoptosis. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oxymetazoline in the management of blepharoptosis. Patients and Methods: A total of five databases were searched. The inclusion was limited only to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the efficacy of oxymetazoline versus placebo. The efficacy endpoint was the mean change in the marginal reflex distance 1 (MRD 1) from baseline. The safety endpoints were mortality and adverse events (AEs). The weighted mean difference (WMD) was implemented for continuous outcomes. For risk of bias assessment, the Revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials was used. Results: 4 RCTs (n = 448) met the eligibility criteria. The meta-analysis yielded a statistically significant higher difference in the WMD in the oxymetazoline group [0.65 mm (95% CI: 0.44 mm to 0.86 mm)] compared to the placebo group [0.26 mm (95% CI: 0.30 mm to 0.48 mm) [p=0.012]. There were no statistically significant differences between the oxymetazoline group [1.2% (95% CI: 0.4-3.6%)] and the placebo group [1.6% (95% CI: 0.5-5.3%), p = 0.73] in terms of serious adverse events. Conclusion: Oxymetazoline is an effective and safe medication in the management of acquired blepharoptosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.