ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2025
Gait stability prediction through synthetic time-series and vision-based data.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Gait stability assessment in older adults is challenged by limited data availability and measurement complexity, particularly among vulnerable populations and in limited resource settings. We address three research questions: (1) can synthetic data accurately replicate the statistical properties of gait parameters in older adults? (2) how effectively do synthetic data-trained models predict the Margin of Stability (MoS) when tested on real-world data? and (3) what specific biomechanical features contribute most significantly to the MoS predictions in older adults? To address these challenges, the present study proposes a novel approach to gait stability prediction by integrating computer vision with a data-centric synthetic data generation (SDG) approach using accessible, low-cost technology. Methods: Using a public dataset from 14 healthy older adults (86.7 ± 6.2 years), we implemented a constraint-based SDG methodology that preserved biomechanical relationships through SDG metadata configuration and rank correlation-based constraints. Gait analysis was performed through a smartphone (Motorola Moto G5 Play) and the open-source MediaPipe algorithm to extract body landmarks from frontal plane gait videos, making the approach suitable for resource-limited settings. Results: Our approach achieved exceptional fidelity (97.09% overall) and maintained biomechanical variable relationships. The model trained exclusively on synthetic data (TSTR) outperformed the model trained on real data (TRTR), with error reductions (RMSE decreased by 56.3%, MAE by 58.2%, and MSE by 80.9%) and improved variance explanation ( Discussion: Therefore, our results show that: (1) synthetic data accurately replicated gait parameters with high fidelity; (2) synthetic data-trained models outperformed real data-trained models in MoS prediction; and (3) step width, BMI, and fall history were the most significant predictors of MoS in older adults. These findings demonstrate the potential of synthetic biomechanical time series to overcome data scarcity, improve predictive modeling capabilities, and enhance clinical gait assessment through accessible, low-cost computer vision methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.