Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40881478›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2025

Mental health literacy and psychological outcomes in dual-career athletes.

Janja Usenik, Eva Kranjec

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Janja UsenikFaculty of Education, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
Eva KranjecFaculty of Education, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Dual-career athletes experience the unique challenges of balancing sporting, academic, and vocational pursuits, which can strain their well-being and increase psychological distress. This study examined the mental health of Slovenian dual-career athletes, including the prevalence of anxiety, depression, and overall well-being, as well as their mental health literacy and its potential relationship with psychological distress and well-being. Methods: 219 Slovenian dual-career athletes (58% female; age 15-29) completed self-report measures of anxiety (GAD-7), depression (PHQ-9), and mental well-being (WHO-5), alongside the Slovenian version of the Mental Health Literacy Scale (S-MHLS). Point and lifetime prevalence of mental health problems were assessed. Multiple regression analyses were employed to examine group differences and predictors of mental health outcomes. Results: Moderate to severe symptoms of anxiety and depression were reported by 22% and 23% of athletes, respectively, while 43% scored below the threshold for positive mental well-being. Female athletes reported significantly poorer mental health across all indicators. Regression analyses showed that greater knowledge about where and how to seek mental health information predicted lower levels of anxiety and depression and higher well-being. In contrast, more stigmatizing attitudes were linked to higher psychological distress. Discussion: These findings suggest that improving athletes' mental health literacy could help protect their well-being in the dual-career context. Tailored strategies to promote help-seeking and reduce stigma, while considering gender and the demands of dual careers, may be crucial for enhancing young athletes' psychological well-being and creating more supportive environments.

Indexed as

anxietydepressiondual-career athletesmental health literacymental well-being

Identifiers

PMID40881478
PMCPMC12381560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.