Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40881390›Full record

ArticleJACS Au2025

Magnetic Stirring May Cause Irreproducible Results in Chemical Reactions.

Vera A Cherepanova, Evgeniy G Gordeev, Valentine P Ananikov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACS Au, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vera A CherepanovaZelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky Prospect, 47, Moscow 119991, Russia.
Evgeniy G GordeevZelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky Prospect, 47, Moscow 119991, Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0545-5720
Valentine P AnanikovZelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky Prospect, 47, Moscow 119991, Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6447-557X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic stirrers, the most widely used and ubiquitous devices for performing chemical reactions in laboratory settings, may cause reproducibility problems. Reproducibility in a range of chemical processes can be affected by various factors, ranging from minor to significant effects, including yield, composition, and glassware contamination. In this study, we illustrate the reproducibility issues that may arise from the use of a magnetic stirrer for three fundamental types of chemical reactions. Significant differences were found in the reaction rates and sizes of the nanoparticles obtained via parallel synthesis with the same magnetic stirrer. For catalyst preparation, differences were observed in the morphology of the metal nanoparticles and the process rate depending on the location of the reaction vessel on the magnetic stirrer. In the case of organic synthesis examples, the conversions of parallel catalytic cross-coupling reactions in vessels standing beside each other on the same magnetic stirrer can be significantly different. The results of these experiments revealed the influence of previously unaccounted-for factors, and here, we suggest a control experiment to improve reproducibility. Given the ubiquitous use of magnetic stirrers in chemistry, biology, life sciences, and material sciences, the revealed reproducibility-affecting factor is of broad concern.

Indexed as

catalysismagnetic stirrernanoparticlesorganic synthesisreproducibility

Identifiers

PMID40881390
PMCPMC12381720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.