ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
Establishment of a risk prediction model for residual back pain after percutaneous kyphoplasty in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided ultra-micro needle knife combined with PVP in elderly patients with OVCF: a retrospective study.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Severe residual back pain (RBP) after percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) significantly impacts postoperative prognosis and quality of life in patients. The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors for RBP in osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) patients after PKP, to establish a risk prediction model, and to validate its effectiveness. Methods: A case-control study was carried out among OVCF patients, who were assigned to either the training set (these patients were recruited from January 2018 and June 2020) or the validation set (these patients were recruited from July 2020 and December 2020). Risk factors were identified by univariate analysis and multifactor logistic regression analysis. The performance of the prediction model was determined by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) to assess discrimination. A nomogram for risk prediction was constructed, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and calibration curves were used to assess calibration, and decision curve analysis was used to assess the clinical use of the model. Results: A total of 647 patients were included, 569 cases were used to train the model and 78 cases were used for external validation. Based on the data of model training set, age, bone mineral density, trauma history, posterior fascial edema, platelet distribution width, serum chloride, and middle vertebral height were independent risk factors for RBP after PKP ( Conclusion: The constructed model showed good predictive ability in the occurrence of residual back pain after PKP, which can provide a scientific basis and guidance for clinical prevention and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.