ArticleDelaware journal of public health2025
It Never Stopped: The Continued Violation of Forced, Coerced, and Involuntary Sterilization.
Article in Delaware journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Transmasculine pregnancy-Occurrence, associations, and outcomes: A quantitative systematic review.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
From the Buggery laws of 1533, to the hundreds of years of medical experiments taking advantage of already historically oppressed communities throughout the world, to the current anti-Trans laws and policies that are bombarding the nation today, reproductive autonomy has long been treated as a privilege as opposed to an inalienable right. The notion of reproductive freedom should be uncompromisable but it has not been fully realized due to the fostering and the legitimizing of coercive systems that keep marginalized communities oppressed, perpetuate violations to a person's body, and that prevent individuals from asserting themselves as the experts of their lives. While self-declaration, reproductive autonomy, and clear informed consent should always be the highest standard, we continue to see that these basic human rights are simply not afforded to all. This paper explores the history of coerced, forced, and involuntary sterilization, globally and in the United States, as a means of population control through criminalized punishment, "cures" to gynecological issues, and the gatekeeping of bodily autonomy, with a call to attention on how this practice has and continues to impact persons of color, the poor, and the LGBTQIA+ community. The authors of this paper aim to shift the oppressive standards that currently exist towards self-declaration, reproductive and sexual autonomy, and self-advocacy as a means to combat the harm of coerced sterilization and its intentional practice in medicine and policies. The clinical considerations provided intend to challenge the reader to examine their own actions as a possible "conspirator" to the passive eugenic practices that lead to sterilization by default, as outlined by the authors.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.