ArticleWorld journal of methodology2025
Use of artificial intelligence in neurological disorders diagnosis: A scientometric study.
Article in World journal of methodology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) has become significantly integrated into healthcare, particularly in the diagnosing of neurological disorders. This advancement has enabled neurologists and physicians to diagnose conditions more quickly and effectively, ultimately benefiting patients.
aimTo explore the current status and key highlights of AI-related articles in diagnosing of neurological disorders.
methodsA systematic literature review was conducted in the Web of Science Core Collection database using the following strategy: TS = ("Artificial Intelligence" OR "Computational Intelligence" OR "Machine Learning" OR "AI") AND TS = ("Neurological disorders" OR "CNS disorder" AND "diagnosis"). The search was limited to articles and reviews. Microsoft Excel 2019 and VOSviewer were utilized to identify major contributors, including authors, institutions, countries, and journals. Additionally, VOSviewer was employed to analyze and visualize current trends and hot topics through network visualization maps.
resultsA total of 276 publications from 2000 to 2024 were retrieved. The United States, India, and China emerged as the top contributors in this field. Major institutions included Johns Hopkins University, King's College London, and Harvard Medical School. The most prolific author was U. Rajendra Acharya from the University of Southern Queensland (Australia). Among journals,
conclusionResearch on AI's role in diagnosing neurological disorders is becoming widely recognized for its growing importance. AI shows promise in diagnosing various neurological disorders, yet requires further improvement and extensive future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.