Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40881198›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2025

Age- and sex-related differences in landmark recall following a virtual spatial navigation task.

Alexis N Chargo, Cheryl L Dahle, Naftali Raz, Ana M Daugherty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexis N ChargoInstitute of Gerontology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States.
Cheryl L DahleInstitute of Gerontology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States.
Naftali RazDepartment of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States.
Ana M DaughertyInstitute of Gerontology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Wayfinding is a cognitive ability that supports accurate spatial navigation and declines in this ability adversely affect independent living in older age. The cognitive map represents environmental details, such as landmark cues, relative to the goal location. Distal cues appear to be less effective than proximal ones in precisely locating the goal. Age-related declines in spatial precision may result in fewer accurate landmark-place details or hinder the differential use of cue types. Methods: This study examined spatial navigation abilities using a virtual adaptation of the Morris Water Maze in a community lifespan sample of 169 adults (aged 18-78 years). Following 25 learning trials with a fixed, hidden platform, spatial precision of recalling the platform location was tested with map reproduction tasks that manipulated the environmental presentation of cues. Results: Age-related differences varied by sex; middle-aged and older women were less precise in recalling platform location compared to men, but only when provided with all distal and proximal cues. This effect was partially related to the recall accuracy of landmark-place associations: middle-aged and older women who had recalled fewer details were less precise when provided all landmark cues. By comparison, the association between free recall and spatial precision was weaker in younger women and in middle-aged and older men. Discussion: These findings suggest differential age- and sex-related variations in the integration of navigation cues in wayfinding.

Indexed as

cognitive maplandmark recallnavigation cuesspatial navigationwayfinding

Identifiers

PMID40881198
PMCPMC12380832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.