ArticleLandscape ecology2025
Characterizing landscape configuration effects on eastern spruce budworm infestation dynamics.
Article in Landscape ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: Spruce budworm ( Objectives: We hypothesized that fragmented landscapes characterized by smaller and more dispersed conifer patches intermixed with other land cover types may promote infestations thanks to the ability of SBW to saturate the landscape and avidly consume limited resources. To test our hypothesis, we investigated to what degree landscape configuration plays a significant role in modulating defoliations using spectrally-segmented forest stands. Next, we determined the major drivers of infestation probabilities and how they have evolved as a result of landscape configuration changes. Methods: We capitalized on a combination of Landsat imagery, Forest Resource Inventory (FRI) data, and probability estimates from random forest models to investigate multi-scale effects of landscape configuration on SBW infestations over 13 years in eastern Quebec, Canada, in a spatially-explicit fashion. Based on annual best available pixel composites of surface reflectance derived from Landsat, we superimposed a 400 m tessellation over which we extracted six landscape configuration metrics describing area, aggregation, and shape for infested and non-infested conifer forest patches. Next, probability estimates from two sets of random forest models were extracted from the configuration metrics at annual time steps and for the entire length of the time series. Results: Landscapes characterized by greater fragmentation of conifer patches had a higher risk of infestation. In such landscapes, greater fragmentation was indicated by smaller and more variable-sized conifer patches, with a mean patch area < 40 ha (CV > 100 ha) and a landscape patch index < 50 %. In addition, such areas had more isolated patches and more complex shapes, as indicated by cohesion < 97 %, landscape shape index > 3, and shape > 1.35. The landscape patch index, quantifying the percentage of landscape covered by the largest coniferous patch, had the greatest influence on SBW infestations. These results confirmed our initial hypothesis that a higher level of fragmentation of conifer patches may favor infestation establishment. Conclusions: We demonstrated the use of freely available Landsat imagery to extract configuration metrics in a spatially-explicit fashion. Further, we highlighted the value of using probability estimates to capture landscape configurations at higher risk of infestations. This knowledge can inform forest management practices, such as where harvesting operations may be carried out on the landscape or where planting may be prioritized to reduce conifer stand fragmentation and infestation risk. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10980-025-02203-z.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.