Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40881093›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of clinical pediatrics2025

Pediatric emergency care: Determinants and systematic barriers.

Pankaj Soni, Amit Agrawal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of clinical pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pankaj SoniDepartment of Neonatology, Thumbay University Hospital, Ajman 4184, United Arab Emirates.
Amit AgrawalDepartment of Pediatrics, Gandhi Medical College, Hamidia Hospital Campus, Bhopal 462022, India. agrawaldramit@yahoo.co.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pediatric emergency care (PEC) encompasses the specialized medical care delivered to infants, children, and adolescents facing urgent medical situations, addressing critical conditions such as infections, allergic responses, seizures, respiratory distress, and trauma. PEC calls for prompt, focused interventions to address each child's developmental and physiological needs. The literature was searched using Google Scholar, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library to retrieve studies assessing quality indicators and outcomes in pediatric emergencies. The search was limited to papers published in peer-reviewed journals between 01 Jan 2000 and 15 Dec 2024. This review evaluates current PEC standards such as patient safety, diagnostic precision, timeliness, and patient and family satisfaction. Patient safety is vital because children are particularly vulnerable to medical errors, such as inappropriate doses of medication. The provision of high-quality PEC is hampered by systemic issues such as inadequate training, a lack of resources, and restricted access to treatment. Telemedicine, pediatric transport units, artificial intelligence applications for diagnostics, and simulation-based training are suggested approaches to overcome these challenges. Research networks and quality improvement initiatives are important steps to improve PEC care.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDiagnostic accuracyEmergency departmentHealthcare deliveryPediatric emergency careQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID40881093
PMCPMC12305056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.