ArticleWorld journal of clinical pediatrics2025
Validating a novel scoring system for the assessment and treatment of functional gastrointestinal disorders in children.
Article in World journal of clinical pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical utility of the Pediatric Bowel Management Scoring Tool in guiding management of childhood constipation-a prospective, multicenter study.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFunctional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs), defined as 'Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction', are now considered a global health problem. There is a dearth of concepts and scales to assess the severity of the different symptoms encountered while dealing with the variety of FGIDs as described in the ROME IV classification. We introduced a novel scoring system with the incorporation of 16 different symptoms called Bacharyya's Questionnaire Scale and started using it while dealing with children suffering from FGIDs.
aimTo verify the usefulness and applicability of this recently developed scale, this study was undertaken with the objectives to establish the validity of this scoring system in assessing the severity of symptoms associated with a specific FGID in children and to determine the scoring system's applicability in assessing the treatment response.
methodsThe study included children aged 5 to 18 years diagnosed with any FGID based on ROME IV criteria. They completed the newly developed scale and a Visual Analog Scale at initial diagnosis and after a 2-month treatment period. A control group without FGID participated for comparative baseline purposes. Treatment response was defined as a less than or equal to 50% reduction in the total score, which is statistically significant.
resultsResults from a comprehensive cohort of 190 cases and 90 controls indicated a female preponderance (57.9%) and prevalent disorders such as functional constipation (28%) and functional abdominal pain, not otherwise specified (21%). The grade of FGID (mild, moderate, severe) experienced by the patients was also derived. Post-treatment, 96 children demonstrated symptom improvement. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient for pre (
conclusionThe novel scoring system shows high comprehensibility and gives an objective view of the symptomatology of FGIDs. The use of this novel score in clinical settings will be helpful to typify the FGIDs and may significantly improve decision-making processes to initiate appropriate treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.