ArticleWorld journal of clinical pediatrics2025
Comparative analysis on the efficacy of antenatal corticosteroids in preterm newborns in a Kazakhstani Tertiary Care Hospital setting.
Article in World journal of clinical pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFor over half a century, the administration of maternal corticosteroids before anticipated preterm birth has been regarded as a cornerstone intervention for enhancing neonatal outcomes, particularly in preventing respiratory distress syndrome. Ongoing research on antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) is continuously refining the evidence regarding their efficacy and potential side effects, which may alter the application of this treatment. Recent findings indicate that in resource-limited settings, the effectiveness of ACS is contingent upon meeting specific conditions, including providing adequate medical support for preterm newborns. Future studies are expected to concentrate on developing evidence-based strategies to safely enhance ACS utilization in low- and middle-income countries.
aimTo analyze the clinical effectiveness of antenatal corticosteroids in improving outcomes for preterm newborns in a tertiary care hospital setting in Kazakhstan, following current World Health Organization guidelines.
methodsThis study employs a comparative retrospective cohort design to analyze single-center clinical data collected from January 2022 to February 2024. A total of 152 medical records of preterm newborns with gestational ages between 24 and 34 weeks were reviewed, focusing on the completeness of the ACS received. Quantitative variables are presented as means with standard deviations, while frequency analysis of qualitative indicators was performed using Pearson's
resultsThe obtained data indicate that the complete implementation of antenatal steroid prophylaxis (ASP) improves neonatal outcomes, particularly by reducing the frequency of birth asphyxia (
conclusionIn a tertiary hospital setting, the implementation of ACS therapy for pregnancies between 24 and 34 weeks of gestation at high risk for preterm birth significantly reduces the incidence of neonatal complications and related interventions. This, in turn, contributes to better outcomes for this cohort of children. However, the impact of ACS on maternal outcomes requires further thorough investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.