ArticleDigital health
Needs assessment and prioritization of key medical specialties: A telemedicine roadmap based on a mixed-methods framework.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In an era where geographical distance has become a barrier to equitable access to health services, an intelligent needs assessment of medical specialties is the key to enabling effective telemedicine. A systematic needs assessment of medical specialties is the cornerstone in designing a telemedicine roadmap. This study aimed to identify and prioritize key specialties based on needs-based criteria for the development of telemedicine in the community covered by Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. Methods: This study's methodology was modeled on the "need-based planning framework for telemedicine services" developed by the University of Queensland, Australia. A mixed approach was used in the study design. In the first three steps, quantitative and qualitative data were collected to identify the community's specialized medical needs. In the fourth step, the identified needs were prioritized. Results: A total of 11 specialties, including neurosurgery, cardiology, general surgery, general internal medicine, orthopedics, pediatrics, neurology, psychiatry, obstetrics and gynecology, imaging, and urology, were identified as key priority specialties needed for the development of telemedicine in the community covered by Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. These specialties were prioritized into eight ranks based on need-based criteria. Conclusion: By identifying and prioritizing 11 key medical specialties, this study has laid a valuable foundation for the development of telemedicine services. Its findings provide policymakers with an effective guide to strategically allocate resources toward prioritized specialties, enhance technological infrastructure, and implement relevant educational programs, thereby ensuring equitable access to services and taking a significant step toward advancing justice in healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.