ArticleRural mental health2025
Building the Plane as We Fly: Considerations for Scaling Out Coordinated Specialty Care for Early Psychosis in the Rural United States.
Article in Rural mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implementing Coordinated Specialty Care Programs for Psychosis Across the U.S.: State-Level Administrator and Provider Perspectives.Community mental health journal · 2026Article
- Adaptation of the First Episode Psychosis Services-Fidelity Scale for Use in New and Small Programs.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Expanding access to harm reduction in rural communities through community-informed public health vending machines.Harm reduction journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Coordinated Specialty Care (CSC) programs for early psychosis (EP) have expanded rapidly in the United States (US) in recent years due to evidence supporting early intervention and subsequent federal funding. The majority of CSC programs are located in major urban and surrounding suburban areas, although many states are expanding or planning to expand CSC services to rural and remote areas. Despite ongoing implementation efforts, little is known about effective implementation of CSC in rural and remote communities. The present article uses the "scale out" model as a guiding framework to consider how CSC can be implemented in rural areas and describes considerations relevant to infrastructure for rural CSC: defining rurality, priority population, workforce, financing, telehealth, strengths of rural communities, culture and social determinants of health. We then discuss two overarching challenges of: a) integrating alternative bottom-up, community partnership approaches, such as community-based participatory research (CBPR), into the scale out model and b) using the scale out model for an implementation effort that is already underway. We argue that successful rural CSC implementation will involve integrating the scale out model with rigorous CBPR to incorporate theory with real-world needs and learn in real-time from ongoing implementation efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.