ArticleBJUI compass2025
From collection to correction: Can serial 24-hour urine collections demonstrate improved urinary stone parameters?
Article in BJUI compass, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To determine whether serial 24-hour urine collections from the same patient over time result in improved stone risk parameters. Patients and Methods: Using a 24-hour urinalysis database, 1832 tests from 688 patients collected over a 10-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Patients included in the analysis had a minimum follow-up of 2 years and at least three 24-hour urine collections. Changes in risk parameters were evaluated over time with each patient acting as their own control. Statistical analysis was performed using repeated measures ANOVA with a Greenhouse-Geisser correction and post-hoc analysis with Bonferroni correction. Significance level was set as p < 0.05. Results: A total of 225 patients had at least three 24-hour urine collections, of which 48% were female. From the first to the second 24-hour urine collections, volume and supersaturation of CaOx, CaP and UA all significantly improved (p < 0.05). From the second to the third collection, only the supersaturation of CaP significantly improved (p < 0.05). Approximately half of the patients continued to see improvement in stone risk parameters between the second and third urine collection. Conclusion: Serial 24-hour urine collections performed at 6-month or greater intervals were significantly associated with improvements in stone risk parameters. This study suggests that serial collections can aid in the correction of urinary stone parameters and should be considered in active stone formers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.