Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40880971›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2025

Effects of total intravenous anaesthesia versus inhalation anaesthesia on gastrointestinal function recovery after laparoscopic hysterectomy: A randomised controlled trial.

Huimin Hu, Zheng Niu, Jie Song, Ting Wang, Dunyi Qi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Huimin HuJiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7225-2244
Zheng NiuDepartment of Anaesthesia, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7592-8933
Jie SongJiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8208-4997
Ting WangJiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5660-815X
Dunyi QiDepartment of Anaesthesia, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0432-5422

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: As gynaecological laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery continues to advance, it becomes essential to explore how inhalation anaesthesia and intravenous anaesthesia affect the recovery of gastrointestinal function after surgery. The objective was to compare the effects of total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) and inhalation anaesthesia on the time of the first defecation and the time of consuming solid food for patients following laparoscopic total hysterectomy. Methods: This research involved 134 female participants aged 18-65 years, classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II, who were scheduled to undergo elective laparoscopic hysterectomy procedures. Participants were randomly allocated into two cohorts: one receiving TIVA (Group P) (underwent TIVA induction with propofol, remifentanil, and rocuronium administration, supplemented by ongoing administration of propofol-remifentanil infusions), and the other group was administered inhalational anaesthesia (Group S) (using sevoflurane delivered through precise tidal volume ventilation alongside rocuronium, with maintenance achieved through combined sevoflurane inhalation and remifentanil infusion). The primary outcome was the time to initial defecation and tolerance of solid food (SF + D), while the final outcome was determined by the longer duration required to achieve these two outcomes. The I-FEED (intake, feeling nauseated, emesis, physical examination, and duration of symptoms) score, the numeric rating scale score for pain, and the numeric rating scale score for postoperative nausea and vomiting, the time to first flatus, gastric antral motility index, and intestinal peristalsis rate within 1 minute determined by bedside ultrasound were also recorded. Results: The mean to first defecation + hard food tolerance (SF + D) was 51 [standard deviation (SD: 8.47)] in Group S and 47 (SD: 9.45) in Group P ( Conclusion: The postoperative recovery of gastrointestinal function can be enhanced by employing total intravenous anaesthesia instead of inhalation anaesthesia.

Indexed as

Anaesthesiadefecationfood tolerancegastrointestinal motilityhysterectomyI-FEEDinhalationintravenouslaparoscopysevofluranevolatile agent

Identifiers

PMID40880971
PMCPMC12377545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.