Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40880958›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2025

Evaluation of the predictive value of tongue height to oral cavity height ratio and anterior neck soft tissue measurements for difficult laryngoscopy in patients with unanticipated difficult airway: A prospective observational study.

Sambit Nandi, Aparajita Panda, Nitasha Mishra, Parnandi Bhaskar Rao, Anand Srinivasan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sambit NandiDepartment of Onco-Anaesthesia and Palliative Medicine, Dr BRA-IRCH, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9767-7939
Aparajita PandaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, AIIMS, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6707-4627
Nitasha MishraDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, AIIMS, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3558-2755
Parnandi Bhaskar RaoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, AIIMS, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2731-5657
Anand SrinivasanDepartment of Pharmacology, AIIMS, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0663-0922

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Effective airway assessment prevents intubation failure. Despite the limited sensitivity of standard tools, ultrasonography (USG) offers promise, especially in predicting difficult laryngoscopies. Our study aims to evaluate tongue-to-oral height ratio (TTOHR) and anterior neck soft tissue measurements on airway USG to predict difficult laryngoscopy. Methods: This prospective observational study enroled 120 patients posted for elective surgery under general anaesthesia, without anticipated difficult airways. The skin to hyoid bone distance (SHBD), skin to epiglottis distance (SED), skin to thyrohyoid membrane distance (STHMD), and TTOHR were measured on USG. Modified Cormack-Lehane (CL) grading at laryngoscopy was the primary outcome. Statistical analysis included ROC curve analysis, multivariable logistic regression, and evaluation of predictive models combining multiple USG parameters. Results: The incidence of difficult laryngoscopy and intubation was 11.6% and 6.6%, respectively. The highest diagnostic performance was observed for SED, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.95 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.91, 0.98], a cut-off value of 1.87 cm, a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 89%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 90%. STHMD followed with an AUC of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.99), a cut-off of 1.58 cm, a sensitivity of 90%, a specificity of 86%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 84%. TTOHR showed an AUC of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.78, 1.00), with a cut-off value of 0.80, a sensitivity of 92%, a specificity of 98%, and the highest diagnostic accuracy of 97% (95% CI: 0.96, 1.00). Various models, tested using three or four parameters, showed AUC values ranging from 0.96 to 0.97. A model containing TTOHR, SHBD, and STHMD was identified as a best-fit model for predicting difficult laryngoscopy. Conclusion: SED, STHMD, and TTOHR individually showed substantial diagnostic accuracy, with AUCs ranging from 0.92 to 0.95. Analysis of models combining parameters outperformed individual measurements, with statistically significant contributions from TTOHR and SHBD.

Indexed as

Airway assessmentairway managementdifficult airwayMallampati scoreskin-to-epiglottis distanceskin-to-thyrohyoid membrane distancetongue height-to-oral height ratiotongue thicknessultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID40880958
PMCPMC12377552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.