ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Exploring peer education for migrant informal caregivers of mentally ill loved ones: a realist evaluation protocol.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Navigating Stigma and Support: Realist Evaluation of Support for Migrant Informal Caregivers of Loved Ones with Mental Illness.Community mental health journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Informal caregivers with a migration background who care for someone with a mental illness often experience elevated caregiver burdens due to factors such as discrimination, language barriers, and stigma. In The Netherlands, a peer education intervention called 'They Are not Mental?!' (TANM) addresses these challenges by reducing stigma, increasing help-seeking behaviors, and improving access to healthcare. This transdisciplinary study evaluates how contextual factors and mechanisms influence its outcomes. Description: This research protocol outlines a realist evaluation of the intervention using a mixed-methods design, including interviews, post-questionnaires, and observations. The study will develop and refine the program theory to determine for whom, in what contexts, why, and how the intervention works. Discussion: This protocol shows how we plan to investigate how, why, for whom and under what circumstances TANM produces its intended outcomes, using a realist evaluation approach. This approach is well-suited for evaluating complex interventions because it accommodates for dynamic and iterative interventions. Its focus is on understanding patterns and mechanisms within specific contexts, using program theories. Conclusion: The evaluation of TANM will inform future intervention adaptations and guide future efforts to support vulnerable populations, particularly migrants navigating caregiving challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.