ArticleJournal of infection prevention2025
Can ward rounds be used by infection prevention control teams to deliver education and enhance knowledge to clinical staff.
Article in Journal of infection prevention, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Infection Prevention Control (IPC) education is a key aspect of training for all staff as it forms a fundamental aspect of patient safety. The majority of IPC education is carried out in the classroom, by e-learning or through simulation. Different models of education delivery have been evaluated in healthcare outside of IPC with some success, including ward rounds. Therefore, a ward round intervention was utilised using an action research model to evaluate if it was feasible to carry out IPC education in the clinical environment and determine if it improved education opportunities and knowledge for staff. Methods: A mixed methods approach was used to collect qualitative and quantitative data in the form of questionnaires, interventions and reflections using thematic analysis. Discussion: The results suggest that a ward round intervention for IPC education provides opportunities for staff to receive education. It also could contribute to an improved relationship between ward and IPC staff through collaborative working. Conclusion: Whilst this was only a small action research study in one ward with limitations the findings suggest that IPC education can be delivered in the clinical environment and that IPC education delivery is an area that requires more research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.