ReviewHong Kong journal of occupational therapy : HKJOT2025
Virtual, augmented, and mixed reality training for improving social skills in individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A systematic review.
Review in Hong Kong journal of occupational therapy : HKJOT, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In occupational therapy, various accessible and effective interventions have been used to improve social skills and participation of individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). The objective of this systematic review was to examine whether virtual, augmented, and mixed reality (VAMR) training affect the development of social skills in individuals with ASD. Methods: A literature search was conducted across MEDLINE, EMBASE, ERIC, and Web of Science databases. Full articles were reviewed and meticulously screened. Data were extracted from the studies, statistical heterogeneity was evaluated, and effect size was calculated. Results: Using these criteria, 2,929 articles were identified and seven studies were selected. In total, seven studies with 417 individuals with ASD were included. All studies were judged to have an unclear risk of bias concerning the randomization process as they failed to report sufficient information about the selection of the reported results. When analyzed by developmental period, interventions applied to individuals with ASD for social skills were most common from middle childhood to early adolescence. Conclusion: Current evidence is insufficient to support effectiveness, and further research is needed to better understand the scope of VAMR training that can provide social skills to individuals with ASD. Nevertheless, this review is significant in that it concluded an intervention combining cognitive behavioral training and VAMR training is useful for individuals in the developmental age group from mid-childhood to early adolescence for their social skills development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.