Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40880874›Full record

ArticleLimnology and oceanography2025

Evaluating Sulfurization as a Blue Carbon Sink in a Southern California Salt Marsh.

L R Capece, M Bailey, M Morrison, A A Phillips, L Sharpnack, S M Webb, D C Brenner, M Gomes, M R Raven

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Limnology and oceanography, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

L R CapeceDepartment of Earth Science, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7206-6728
M BaileyDepartment of Earth Science, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-4163-338X
M MorrisonDepartment of Earth Science, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-5114-6140
A A PhillipsDepartment of Earth Science, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5959-5238
L SharpnackDepartment of Earth Science, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7974-9211
S M WebbStanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, Stanford University, Menlo Park, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1188-0464
D C BrennerEarth and Planetary Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2562-5683
M GomesEarth and Planetary Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9707-350X
M R RavenDepartment of Earth Science, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4953-9966

Funding

A Synchrotron Radiation Structural Biology ResourcesP30GM133894 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Ritimukta Sarangi · 2020 to 2026
$43.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM133894
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blue carbon ecosystems (BCEs) such as seagrass meadows, mangrove forests, and salt marshes are important carbon sinks that store carbon for millennia. Recently, organic matter (OM) sulfurization and pyritization have been proposed as mechanisms of net carbon storage in BCEs. At our study site, organic sulfur that is resistant to acid hydrolysis (protokerogen) is an order of magnitude less abundant than pyrite sulfur, suggesting a dominance of pyritization over sulfurization. C/N ratios and carbon isotope compositions suggest that nearly half of total organic carbon and ≥80% of protokerogen is composed of marsh plant material. Sediment protokerogen appears to be sulfurized based on its low δ

Identifiers

PMID40880874
PMCPMC12383028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.