ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Evaluation of forage production performance and prediction of introduction adaptability for different
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The grassland degradation and harsh climate in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP) have constrained forage production, thereby impeding the development of animal husbandry in pastoral areas of China. The effective cultivation of high-yielding Methods: This study comprehensively evaluated the forage yield and related agronomic traits of 62 Results: The results indicated that: (1) 43 of 62 germplasms could successfully completed the fertility period in the eastern edge of the QTP; (2) Fresh and hay grass yield were significantly positively correlated with absolute plant height, flag leaf length, flag leaf width, flag leaf area, flag-second leaf length, flag-second leaf width, flag-second leaf area, number of total tiller, number of vegetative tiller, stem to leaf ratio of hay, thick of second stem internode, spike length, and root depth, while significantly negatively correlated with thousand kernel weight; (3) Fresh and hay grass yield were directly affected by flag-second leaf length, flag-second leaf width, flag-second leaf area, number of total tiller, number of fertile tiller, and stem to leaf ratio of hay; (4) Discussion: In this study, evaluations of forage production performance and predictions of introduction adaptability were conducted for 62
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.