Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40880846›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery protocols2025

Comparison of outcomes of arterial end-to-side versus end-to-end anastomosis in autologous deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction: DIEP-ES study protocol.

Oliver Didzun, Adriana C Panayi, Iman Ghanad, Sophie Osenegg, Laura Siegwart, Emre Gazyakan, Felix Vollbach, Ulrich Kneser, Amir K Bigdeli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Oliver DidzunDepartment of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, BG Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Adriana C PanayiDepartment of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, BG Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Iman GhanadDepartment of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, BG Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Sophie OseneggDepartment of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, BG Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Laura SiegwartDepartment of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, BG Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Emre GazyakanDepartment of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, BG Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Felix VollbachDepartment of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, BG Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Ulrich KneserDepartment of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, BG Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Amir K BigdeliDepartment of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, BG Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: End-to-end anastomosis to the internal mammary artery (IMA) is the current standard anastomosis technique for women undergoing autologous breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap. This approach fails to preserve the length of the IMA, compromising its availability for cardiac surgery use in women who develop coronary heart disease. A viable alternative may be end-to-side anastomosis, but data on its feasibility is currently lacking. Methods: This pilot study will involve 60 patients at a single-center institute over approximately 24 months. Inclusion criteria are female sex, age >18 years, history of breast cancer, and eligibility for unilateral autologous DIEP breast reconstruction. Exclusion criteria include patients with a legal guardian, inability to consent, and history of blood clotting disorders or hypercoagulability. Data will be collected at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1-year post-surgery. The primary outcome is "major complication" of the recipient site, including anastomotic insufficiency, arterial thrombosis, hematoma, reoperation, or flap loss. Secondary outcomes are abdominal perfusion and major donor site complications, such as wound healing disorders. Patient satisfaction will be assessed using the SF-36 and BREAST-Q (reconstructive module) questionnaires. Study status: The DIEP-ES study has begun enrolment in February 2023. As this is an ongoing trial, no results have been gathered yet. The results will be reported upon completion of the study. We anticipate that the primary and secondary outcomes of the end-to-side approach will be comparable to the accepted standard of care, i.e., end-to-end anastomoses. Conclusions: End-to-side anastomosis may be a safe alternative for DIEP breast reconstruction, especially for patients at risk for coronary heart disease. This pilot study aims to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the end-to-side anastomosis technique in DIEP-flap breast reconstruction. The preliminary findings will inform the design of future multicentric trials to confirm the efficacy of this approach.

Indexed as

anastomosisautologous breast reconstructionbreast reconstructionDIEP flapmicrosurgery

Identifiers

PMID40880846
PMCPMC12052231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.