ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Psychosocial and structural barriers to dual careers among Korean student-athletes: a multilayered ecological perspective.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This qualitative study investigates psychosocial and structural barriers to dual careers faced by Korean student-athletes. In South Korea, coexistence of the elite-centered sports culture and exam-driven education system poses significant challenges for student-athletes seeking to balance their academic and athletic goals. Methods: This study is grounded in Bronfenbrenner's ecological systems theory and explores interactions across five ecological levels: microsystem (parents and coaches), mesosystem (school-sport relationships), exosystem (institutional structures), macrosystem (sociocultural norms), and chronosystem (policy timing). Data were collected through in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 20 participants, including student-athletes, coaches, parents, and teachers. Thematic analysis was conducted using a multilevel coding process. Results: Five core themes emerged: (1) narrow and fragmented career awareness influenced by close stakeholders, (2) passive compliance with sports-centered expectations in school and family systems, (3) structural constraints within athlete development and admissions systems, (4) sociocultural pressure stemming from South Korea's competitive university entrance landscape, and (5) misalignment between dual-career policy intentions and field-level implementation timing. Discussion: These findings illustrate how systemic interactions across ecological levels restrict student-athletes' abilities to pursue dual careers in South Korea. To address these barriers, this study recommends integrated policy strategies that promote institutional flexibility, inter-stakeholder collaboration, and cultural acceptance of diverse career pathways. This research provides practical insights for improving dual-career systems in centralized sports structures, drawing on global models such as the EU Guidelines on Dual Careers of Athletes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.