ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
The impact of time pressure on decision-making and visual search characteristics in basketball players.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effects of imagery practice on basketball-related skills and psychological outcomes: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Pooled it
- Visual search characteristics in two-way skeet shooters of different performance levels during simulated target viewing.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Effects of mental fatigue on basketball decision-making and visual search behavior.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Decision-making performance and motor skill consistency in basketball short pass-shot sequences under different levels of mental fatigue: an integrated psychophysiological dynamics analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Synergistic effects of physical-mental mixed fatigue on badminton forehand smash performance.PloS one · 2026Article
- Integrating the dual-system theory in motor: dynamic framework construction for motor decision-making.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Comparative study on dynamic visual tracking abilities in three-dimensional multi-object tracking tasks among basketball players of different skill levels.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effects of time pressure on decision-making and visual search behavior among college basketball players with different levels of expertise. Methods: Following the expert-novice paradigm, a total of 40 male participants were recruited, including 20 trained basketball athletes and 20 non-athlete college students. A 2 × 2 mixed factorial design was employed, with athletic expertise (athletes vs. non-athletes) as the between-subjects factor and time pressure (present vs. absent) as the within-subjects factor. Participants were presented with video clips from real basketball games. In the time pressure condition, they were required to make a decision-based on the actions of actual players in the video-within a limited time frame and complete a stress perception questionnaire. In the no time pressure condition, no time constraints were imposed. Decision-making performance (response time and accuracy) and eye-tracking metrics were recorded and analyzed. Results: (1) The expert group demonstrated significantly faster response times and higher decision-making accuracy compared to the novice group. (2) In terms of eye-tracking metrics, the expert group exhibited fewer fixations but significantly more saccades and longer fixation durations than the novice group. These findings suggest that experts engage in more focused and efficient visual processing with deeper cognitive engagement. (3) Analysis of fixation distribution and saccade trajectories revealed that experts concentrated more on key informational cues, with tighter and more centralized visual attention patterns, whereas novices showed more scattered and unfocused gaze behaviors. Conclusion: (1) Significant differences in visual search strategies were observed between athletes of different skill levels. Experts displayed more efficient search patterns, quicker responses, and superior decision-making performance. (2) Under time pressure, experts maintained high decision accuracy despite faster response times, and their eye movement patterns remained stable, indicating strong adaptability to stress. (3) In contrast, novices showed a marked decline in accuracy and visual search efficiency under time pressure, suggesting weaker cognitive control in high-stress situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.