ArticlePediatric quality & safety
Survey of Well-being of Young Children: Implementation and Impact on Care Quality.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Despite the American Academy of Pediatrics recommendations to use validated developmental screening tools, national adoption remains low. To address this, we launched a quality improvement project to implement the Survey of Well-being of Young Children (SWYC) in our residency clinic and assess its impact. Our primary aim was to achieve more than 50% screening coverage for early childhood well visits, with equitable implementation across both English-speaking and non-English primary speaking families. We also hypothesized that the implementation of SWYC would equitably increase early intervention (EI) referral rates across language groups. Methods: We included children aged 8-33 months attending well-child visits. Interventions included staff education, daily huddles, and the SWYC integration into the electronic health record. Social work (SW) referrals, though not exclusive to EI, were used as an imperfect proxy, as a designated SW initiates EI referrals in our clinic. We compared referral rates before and after implementation using chi-square tests. Results: SWYC usage reached 50% within 4 months of implementation. There was no significant difference in SWYC use between English and non-English primary speakers ( Conclusions: This quality improvement project highlighted the rapid adoption of a standardized developmental screening tool, resulting in increased SW referrals, which suggests improved identification of developmental concerns with language equity between English and non-English primary speaking families. Standardized screening is an important step in improving developmental outcomes and supporting care equity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.