Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40880771›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025

Fishbone ingestion is a non-negligible cause of intestinal perforation.

Wenwei Zuo, Jiexin Bai, Jing Wei, Chuan Long

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wenwei Zuo *Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Jiexin Bai *Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Jing WeiEye College of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Chuan LongHospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foreign body ingestion (FBI) is considered a widespread global health concern, with fishbone ingestion (FI) occurring frequently. However, fishbone-induced intestinal perforation (FIIP) remains rare and is frequently overlooked in the initial differential diagnosis. A case involving a 39-year-old patient presenting with acute abdominal pain was diagnosed as FIIP. Initial laparoscopic surgery was followed by a laparotomy for fishbone removal, resulting in a favorable patient recovery. The existing literature on FIIP is reviewed in this article. Reported cases underscore the necessity of prompt identification of the perforation's cause and the critical role of thorough medical history-taking. Computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography are considered essential diagnostic tools in confirming the condition. While ultrasonography serves as a rapid, non-invasive preliminary examination, CT is regarded as more accurate and comprehensive. In regions with high fish consumption, FIIP should be considered in adult patients, especially the elderly. Retained fishbones may result in serious complications and should be removed whenever feasible. Clinical education is considered vital in minimizing delays in diagnosis and treatment. The least invasive treatment strategy should be selected according to the patient's clinical status.

Indexed as

abdomenacutediagnosisforeign bodiesintestinal perforation

Identifiers

PMID40880771
PMCPMC12380921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.