Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40880760›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Automatic extraction of SmPC document for IDMP data model construction using foundation LLM and RAG: a preliminary experiment for pharmaceutical regulatory affairs.

Hocine Kadi, Alaa Abdellatif, Daniel Isaac Kemajou Njamen, Florian Pereme

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hocine KadiProduct Life Group, Courbevoie, France.
Alaa AbdellatifProduct Life Group, Courbevoie, France.
Daniel Isaac Kemajou NjamenPharma IT, Product Life Group Company, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Florian PeremeProduct Life Group, Courbevoie, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The pharmaceutical industry is undergoing a significant shift from traditional paper-based processes to data-driven approaches. This transition necessitates the adoption of structured data-exchange standards, such as the IDentification of Medicinal Products (IDMP), to improve harmonization, transparency, and interoperability across global regulatory landscapes. However, transforming unstructured data, such as Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) documents, into structured IDMP models presents considerable challenges in data extraction and standardization. Methods: We investigated the application of foundation Large Language Models (LLMs), namely Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Gemini 1.5 Flash, combined with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) techniques. We utilized various embedding models (generalist, specialized, and hybrid) and rule-based retrieval approaches. To improve the precision of the information extracted from the medicinal product from the SmPC documents, we evaluated multiple prompting strategies. Results: Our investigation showed that Claude 3.5 Sonnet significantly surpassed Gemini 1.5 Flash in performance. Additionally, RAG-type approaches with semantic research using embedding models were superior to rule-based methods overall. The choice of embedding models was essential depending on the type of information being extracted. Prompts that incorporated context, action, and examples were more effective than those based solely on role and steps. The approach achieved a BERT F1 score of up to 0.98 for the medicinal product section. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that the proposed LLM-RAG approach enables accurate and scalable extraction of structured data from SmPCs. This supports the digital transformation of regulatory processes by promoting standardization, interoperability, and harmonization. If implemented effectively, the method could help pharmaceutical companies improve regulatory compliance, streamline submissions, and improve data consistency.

Indexed as

data standardizationIDMPLLMNLPpharmaceutical regulatory affairsRAGregulatory complianceSmPC extraction

Identifiers

PMID40880760
PMCPMC12380897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.