ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Automatic extraction of SmPC document for IDMP data model construction using foundation LLM and RAG: a preliminary experiment for pharmaceutical regulatory affairs.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The pharmaceutical industry is undergoing a significant shift from traditional paper-based processes to data-driven approaches. This transition necessitates the adoption of structured data-exchange standards, such as the IDentification of Medicinal Products (IDMP), to improve harmonization, transparency, and interoperability across global regulatory landscapes. However, transforming unstructured data, such as Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) documents, into structured IDMP models presents considerable challenges in data extraction and standardization. Methods: We investigated the application of foundation Large Language Models (LLMs), namely Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Gemini 1.5 Flash, combined with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) techniques. We utilized various embedding models (generalist, specialized, and hybrid) and rule-based retrieval approaches. To improve the precision of the information extracted from the medicinal product from the SmPC documents, we evaluated multiple prompting strategies. Results: Our investigation showed that Claude 3.5 Sonnet significantly surpassed Gemini 1.5 Flash in performance. Additionally, RAG-type approaches with semantic research using embedding models were superior to rule-based methods overall. The choice of embedding models was essential depending on the type of information being extracted. Prompts that incorporated context, action, and examples were more effective than those based solely on role and steps. The approach achieved a BERT F1 score of up to 0.98 for the medicinal product section. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that the proposed LLM-RAG approach enables accurate and scalable extraction of structured data from SmPCs. This supports the digital transformation of regulatory processes by promoting standardization, interoperability, and harmonization. If implemented effectively, the method could help pharmaceutical companies improve regulatory compliance, streamline submissions, and improve data consistency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.