ArticleStatistics and computing2025
Bayesian additive tree ensembles for composite quantile regressions.
Article in Statistics and computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this paper, we introduce a novel approach that integrates Bayesian additive regression trees (BART) with the composite quantile regression (CQR) framework, creating a robust method for modeling complex relationships between predictors and outcomes under various error distributions. Unlike traditional quantile regression, which focuses on specific quantile levels, our proposed method, composite quantile BART, offers greater flexibility in capturing the entire conditional distribution of the response variable. By leveraging the strengths of BART and CQR, the proposed method provides enhanced predictive performance, especially in the presence of heavy-tailed errors and non-linear covariate effects. Numerical studies confirm that the proposed composite quantile BART method generally outperforms classical BART, quantile BART, and composite quantile linear regression models in terms of RMSE, especially under heavy-tailed or contaminated error distributions. Notably, under contaminated normal errors, it reduces RMSE by approximately 17% compared to composite quantile regression, and by 27% compared to classical BART.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.