Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40880739›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025

Reclaiming voices, rethinking change: a decolonial and knowledge-ecological analysis of SBCC nutrition interventions in Senegal.

Sylvain L Faye, Georgette H Sow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sylvain L FayeDepartment of Sociology, Cheikh Anta Diop University, Dakar, Senegal.
Georgette H SowS&F Pro Consulting, Manteca, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Social and Behavior Change Communication (SBCC) strategies have become central to nutrition interventions in Senegal, particularly to combat malnutrition and food insecurity among caregivers. However, improved nutritional knowledge has not consistently led to sustainable dietary practices. This study explores the limitations of conventional SBCC approaches through a decolonial and ecological lens of knowledge. Methods: This qualitative study draws on ethnographic and participatory research conducted between 2020 and 2024 in Senegal. It focused on malnutrition, stunting, and food fortification initiatives-particularly those involving rice and broth cubes-to investigate the alignment between SBCC messaging and local food cultures. Results: Findings reveal that prevailing SBCC models often rely on top-down, biomedical messaging shaped by Western nutrition science and state dietary norms. These interventions frequently overlook local food ecologies, sociocultural practices, and community knowledge, reinforcing technocratic and neoliberal framings while limiting community agency. Discussion: To enhance relevance and sustainability, we advocate for a decolonial and knowledge-ecological approach to SBCC. This includes centering epistemic justice, fostering relational ethics, and co-creating interventions with communities. Integrating local perspectives and plural knowledges can better address the complex socio-ecological drivers of malnutrition.

Indexed as

community engagementdecolonial approachesepistemic justiceindigenous knowledgenutrition interventionSenegalsocial and behavior change communication

Identifiers

PMID40880739
PMCPMC12380811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.