Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40880703›Full record

ArticleMaedica2025

Disruptions in Renal Stone Management during the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Retrospective Single-Center Study.

Adrian Militaru, Catalin Andrei Bulai, Razvan Dragos Multescu, Cosmin Victor Ene, Mihai Andrei Ene, Cristian Mares, Stefan Balacescu, Dragos Adrian Georgescu, Petrisor Aurelian Geavlete, Bogdan Florin Geavlete

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maedica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Adrian Militaru"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Catalin Andrei Bulai"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Razvan Dragos Multescu"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Cosmin Victor Ene"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Mihai Andrei EneDepartment of Urology, "Saint John" Clinical Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.
Cristian Mares"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Stefan Balacescu"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Dragos Adrian Georgescu"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Petrisor Aurelian Geavlete"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Bogdan Florin Geavlete"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study evaluated changes in renal stone management during the COVID-19 pandemic in a single center, focusing on treatment methods, patient outcomes and healthcare delivery models. Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis comparing patients treated for kidney stones between July-September 2019 (pre-pandemic period) and July-September 2020 (pandemic period). We assessed the number of treated patients, treatment modalities and postoperative outcomes. Results: A total of 77 inpatients were analyzed, of whom 50 had been admitted to hospital during the pre-pandemic period and 27 during the pandemic, which represented a 46% decrease in hospitalizations. There were no significant differences in body mass index, average age, stone laterality, size, or location. Serum creatinine levels and positive urine cultures were also comparable between the groups. A trend toward more minimally invasive procedures was observed during the pandemic, with an increased use of flexible ureteroscopy (62% vs . 70.4%) and a decrease in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (12% vs . 7.4%). Operative times and hospital stays were similar across groups. However, the stone-free rate significantly decreased during the pandemic (91.1% vs . 84.07%). Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly disrupted renal stone management, leading to a preference for minimally invasive surgery but a lower stone-free rate.

Identifiers

PMID40880703
PMCPMC12347054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.