ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2025
Train your robot in AR: insights and challenges for humans and robots in continual teaching and learning.
Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Supportive robots that can be deployed in our homes will need to be understandable, operable, and teachable by non-expert users. This calls for an intuitive Human-Robot Interaction approach that is also safe and sustainable in the long term. Still, few studies have looked at interactive task learning in repeated, unscripted interactions within loosely supervised settings. In such cases the robot should incrementally learn from the user and consequentially expand its knowledge and abilities, a feature which presents the challenge of designing robots that interact and learn in real time. Here, we present a robotic system capable of continual learning from interaction, generalizing learned skills, and planning task execution based on the received training. We were interested in how interacting with such a system would impact the user experience and understanding. In an exploratory study, we assessed such dynamics with participants free to teach the robot simple tasks in Augmented Reality without supervision. Participants could access AR glasses spontaneously in a shared space and demonstrate physical skills in a virtual kitchen scene. A holographic robot gave feedback on its understanding and, after the demonstration, could ask questions to generalize the acquired task knowledge. The robot learned the semantic effects of the demonstrated actions and, upon request, could reproduce those on observed or novel objects through generalization. The results show that the users found the system engaging, understandable, and trustworthy, but with larger variance on the last two constructs. Participants who explored the scene more were able to expand the robot's knowledge more effectively, and those who felt they understood the robot better were also more trusting toward it. No significant variation in the user experience or their teaching behavior was found across two interactions, yet the low return rate and free-form comments hint at critical lessons for interactive learning systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.