ArticleJournal of eye movement research2025
Multimodal Assessment of Therapeutic Alliance: A Study Using Wearable Technology.
Article in Journal of eye movement research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This empirical pilot study explored the use of wearable eye-tracking technology to gain objective insights into interpersonal interactions, particularly in healthcare provider training. Traditional methods of understanding these interactions rely on subjective observations, but wearable tech offers a more precise, multimodal approach. This multidisciplinary study integrated counseling perspectives on therapeutic alliance with an empirically motivated wearable framework informed by prior research in clinical psychology. The aims of the study were to describe the complex data that can be achieved with wearable technology and to test our primary hypothesis that the therapeutic alliance in clinical training interactions is associated with certain behaviors consistent with stronger interpersonal engagement. One key finding was that a single multimodal feature predicted discrepancies in client versus therapist working alliance ratings (b = -4.29, 95% CI [-8.12, -0.38]), suggesting clients may have perceived highly structured interactions as less personal than therapists did. Multimodal features were more strongly associated with therapist rated working alliance, whereas linguistic analysis better captured client rated working alliance. The preliminary findings support the utility of multimodal approaches to capture clinical interactions. This technology provides valuable context for developing actionable insights without burdening instructors or learners. Findings from this study will motivate data-driven methods for providing actionable feedback to clinical trainees.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.