Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40880571›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of critical care medicine2025

Jahi McMath case: A comprehensive and updated narrative.

Calixto Machado

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of critical care medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Calixto MachadoDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Havana 10400, Cuba. cmachado180652@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Jahi McMath case represents a pivotal moment in the reevaluation of brain death or death by neurological criteria (BD/DNC) and disorders of consciousness. Declared brain dead on December 12, 2013, following surgical complications, Jahi's case became a landmark in challenging conventional BD/DNC definitions. As an independent consultant for the International Brain Research Foundation, I recommended advanced ancillary tests, including neuroimaging, electrophysiological, and heart rate variability assessments, conducted at Rutgers University Hospital and Jahi's apartment in New Jersey. My analyses revealed unprecedented findings: Significant preservation of intracranial structures, including the upper brainstem, despite extensive white matter damage and partial herniation. I identified residual cognitive processing and autonomic responses, which suggested a novel disorder of consciousness distinct from both BD/DNC, the unresponsive unawareness syndrome, the minimally conscious state, and the locked-in syndrome. These insights, reinforced by complementary evaluations by Dr. Alan Shewmon, who later documented Jahi's purposeful responses to commands by videos analysis, contributed to reshaping the discourse on consciousness disorders. Despite initial resistance from the scientific community, my findings during September 2014 were eventually published, presenting the first detailed anatomical and functional analysis of Jahi's condition. The Jahi McMath case underscores the need for advanced diagnostics, multidisciplinary collaboration, and a nuanced understanding of consciousness. This case has significant implications for the medical and legal communities, particularly in defining and diagnosing BD/DNC and studying disorders of consciousness. The novel disorder of consciousness might be integrated into existing diagnostic criteria and treatment protocols for BD/DNC and in classifying disorders of consciousness. It remains a cornerstone for future research and challenges in defining and diagnosing BD/DNC.

Indexed as

Brain deathDisorders of consciousnessElectroencephalographyHeart rate variabilityJahi McMathMagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID40880571
PMCPMC12305069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.