ReviewWorld journal of critical care medicine2025
Jahi McMath case: A comprehensive and updated narrative.
Review in World journal of critical care medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Jahi McMath case represents a pivotal moment in the reevaluation of brain death or death by neurological criteria (BD/DNC) and disorders of consciousness. Declared brain dead on December 12, 2013, following surgical complications, Jahi's case became a landmark in challenging conventional BD/DNC definitions. As an independent consultant for the International Brain Research Foundation, I recommended advanced ancillary tests, including neuroimaging, electrophysiological, and heart rate variability assessments, conducted at Rutgers University Hospital and Jahi's apartment in New Jersey. My analyses revealed unprecedented findings: Significant preservation of intracranial structures, including the upper brainstem, despite extensive white matter damage and partial herniation. I identified residual cognitive processing and autonomic responses, which suggested a novel disorder of consciousness distinct from both BD/DNC, the unresponsive unawareness syndrome, the minimally conscious state, and the locked-in syndrome. These insights, reinforced by complementary evaluations by Dr. Alan Shewmon, who later documented Jahi's purposeful responses to commands by videos analysis, contributed to reshaping the discourse on consciousness disorders. Despite initial resistance from the scientific community, my findings during September 2014 were eventually published, presenting the first detailed anatomical and functional analysis of Jahi's condition. The Jahi McMath case underscores the need for advanced diagnostics, multidisciplinary collaboration, and a nuanced understanding of consciousness. This case has significant implications for the medical and legal communities, particularly in defining and diagnosing BD/DNC and studying disorders of consciousness. The novel disorder of consciousness might be integrated into existing diagnostic criteria and treatment protocols for BD/DNC and in classifying disorders of consciousness. It remains a cornerstone for future research and challenges in defining and diagnosing BD/DNC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.