ArticleWorld journal of critical care medicine2025
Diagnostic utility of sepsis screening tools, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein in nosocomial fever of unknown origin.
Article in World journal of critical care medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNosocomial fever of unknown origin (nFUO) is a frequent and challenging diagnostic entity, encompassing diverse infectious and non-infectious etiologies. Timely identification is crucial, yet evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of commonly employed sepsis screening tools and biomarkers remains sparse. We hypothesized that these tools and biomarkers measured at fever onset could distinguish infectious from non-infectious causes of nFUO in critically ill adults.
aimTo evaluate the diagnostic utility of sepsis tools and biomarkers in identifying infectious causes of nFUO.
methodsThis prospective observational study included patients admitted to the Acute Care Emergency Medicine Unit, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India (July 2023 to December 2024). nFUO was defined by Durack and Street criteria. Diagnostic performance of sepsis screening tools (systemic inflammatory response syndrome, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, National Early Warning Score, and Modified Early Warning Score) and biomarkers [procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP)] at fever onset was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
resultsOf 80 cases (mean age 42.9 ± 16.5 years; 80% male), 42.5% had infectious causes, 38.7% non-infectious, and 18.8% remained undiagnosed. Pneumonia (26.2%) and bloodstream infections (11.2%) were the most common infectious etiologies, while central fever and thrombophlebitis (each 7.5%) were predominant among non-infectious causes. Sepsis tools showed poor diagnostic accuracy, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values close to 0.5. PCT demonstrated modest performance (AUC = 0.61; optimal cut-off: 0.85 μg/L), while CRP was paradoxically higher in non-infectious cases (AUC = 0.45). Overall mortality was 20% and was highest among undiagnosed patients (33.3%). Fever duration and hospitalization length were significantly greater in infectious cases.
conclusionSepsis tools, PCT, and CRP have limited utility in identifying infectious causes of nFUO in critically ill adults and should not solely guide initial decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.