Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40880551›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of critical care medicine2025

Role of lung ultrasound in assessing positive end expiratory pressure induced lung recruitment in patients on mechanical ventilation.

Shreyas S Anegundi, Madhuri S Kurdi, Jagadish G Sutagatti, Kaushik A Theerth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of critical care medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shreyas S AnegundiDepartment of Radio-Diagnosis, Karnataka Medical College and Research Institute, Hubballi 580022, Karnataka, India.
Madhuri S KurdiDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Karnataka Medical College and Research Institute, Hubballi 580022, Karnataka, India. drmadhuri_kurdi@yahoo.com.
Jagadish G SutagattiDepartment of Radio-Diagnosis, Karnataka Medical College and Research Institute, Hubballi 580022, Karnataka, India.
Kaushik A TheerthDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Medical Trust Hospital, Ernakulam 682016, Kerala, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLung ultrasonography is being increasingly used in mechanically ventilated patients to evaluate the lung aeration during incremental positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) adjustments and to evaluate the weaning process from mechanical ventilation. The effects of PEEP may vary across different lung pathologies and may not consistently correlate with changes in lung aeration as assessed by lung ultrasound scores (LUSs).

aimTo assess the role of lung ultrasonography in evaluating lung aeration during the application of PEEP in mechanically ventilated patients with various lung pathologies.

methodsAn observational study was conducted over 18 months in a tertiary care hospital. Patients of both genders, aged between 18-75 years, who had been admitted to the intensive care unit, and required mechanical ventilation, were studied. A standard ventilatory strategy was used and incremental levels of PEEP [5, 10, and 15 cm water (H

resultsIn this study, 45.9% of patients required a PEEP of 5 cm H

conclusionIncreasing PEEP levels in mechanically ventilated patients improves lung aeration, which can be effectively assessed using bedside lung ultrasonography.

Indexed as

AerationLung ultrasonographyMechanical ventilationOxygenationPositive end expiratory pressureRecruitment

Identifiers

PMID40880551
PMCPMC12304999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.