Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40880504›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Arab2Vec: An Arabic word embedding model for use in Twitter NLP applications.

Abdelrahman Hamdy, Ayman Youssef, Conor Ryan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Abdelrahman HamdyThe Open University, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom.
Ayman YoussefDepartment of Computers and Systems, Electronics Research Institute, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-6145-4071
Conor RyanBiocomputing and Developmental Systems (BDS) Research Group, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-7002-5815

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The analysis of Arabic Twitter data sets is a highly active research topic, particularly since the outbreak of COVID-19 and subsequent attempts to understand public sentiment related to the pandemic. This activity is partially driven by the high number of Arabic Twitter users, around 164 million. Word embedding models are a vital tool for analysing Twitter data sets, as they are considered one of the essential methods of transforming words into numbers that can be processed using machine learning (ML) algorithms. In this work, we introduce a new model, Arab2Vec, that can be used in Twitter-based natural language processing (NLP) applications. Arab2Vec was constructed using a vast data set of approximately 186,000,000 tweets from 2008 to 2021 from all Arabic Twitter sources. This makes Arab2Vec the most up-to-date word embedding model researchers can use for Twitter-based applications. The model is compared with existing models from the literature. The reported results demonstrate superior performance regarding the number of recognised words and F1 score for classification tasks with known data sets and the ability to work with emojis. We also incorporate skip-grams with negative sampling, an approach that other Arabic models haven't previously used. Nine versions of Arab2Vec are produced; these models differ regarding available features, the number of words trained on, speed, etc. This paper provides Arab2Vec as an open-source project for users to employ in research. It describes the data collection methods, the data pre-processing and cleaning step, the effort to build these nine models, and experiments to validate them qualitatively and quantitatively.

Indexed as

ArabsCOVID-19LanguageNatural Language ProcessingSocial MediaAlgorithmsHumansMachine LearningSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID40880504
PMCPMC12396693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.