ArticlePloS one2025
Comparison of sequential data analysis and functional data analysis for locomotor adaptation.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Learning rates for skills such as walking may depend on circumstances or time, while incentivization with punishments or rewards may affect human skill learning. We consider a state space model for dynamically changed learning rates and figure out the effect of incentivization on the learning rates by utilizing a dynamically weighted particle filter. However, estimations of model parameters, including the learning rate, require a demanding computational burden, especially when the data are collected over a long period. To overcome computational difficulty, we utilize an efficient sequential Monte Carlo method, dynamically weighted particle filter, in the estimations of model parameters. Alternatively, we consider a functional data analysis for the learning rates and the effect of the incentivization. Two approaches have led to reasonable estimations of learning rates. We present the estimated learning rates and the effect of incentivization on the learning rates from two approaches, as well as the comparisons of their results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.